Corporate Governance and Sustainable Organizational Performance: Evidence from Developing Economies

Authors

  • Dr. Elena Marovic Department of Business and Management, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia

Keywords:

Corporate governance, sustainable performance, developing economies, board effectiveness, transparency, stakeholder engagement

Abstract

Corporate governance has become an increasingly important determinant of sustainable organizational performance, particularly in developing economies where institutional weaknesses, limited investor protection, ownership concentration, information asymmetry, and regulatory constraints can influence corporate decision-making. This scholarly article examines how corporate governance mechanisms contribute to sustainable organizational performance by strengthening accountability, transparency, strategic oversight, stakeholder engagement, risk management, and responsible resource allocation. The article develops a conceptual perspective based on agency theory, stakeholder theory, stewardship theory, and institutional theory. Particular attention is given to board effectiveness, board independence, transparency and disclosure, shareholder rights, stakeholder participation, ethical leadership, and sustainability-oriented risk oversight. Evidence from developing and emerging economies suggests that effective governance can improve organizational decision-making and create conditions for stronger long-term performance, although the relationship is not universally linear and may depend on institutional quality and firm-specific characteristics. Previous evidence from India, for example, demonstrates that board characteristics can influence corporate decision-making and performance, while also showing that governance-performance relationships can vary across performance indicators. The article argues that sustainable organizational performance should not be understood solely through short-term profitability but through the organization's ability to generate durable economic, social, environmental, and stakeholder value. The study concludes that strengthening corporate governance systems can help developing-economy organizations improve resilience, investor confidence, operational efficiency, and long-term sustainability.

References

Adams, R. B., Herman, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(1), 58–107.

Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 447–465.

Claessens, S., & Yurtoglu, B. B. (2013). Corporate governance in emerging markets: A survey. Emerging Markets Review, 15, 1–33.

Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49–64.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman.

G20/OECD. (2023). G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023. OECD Publishing.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

Klapper, L. F., & Love, I. (2004). Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(5), 703–728.

Mallin, C. A. (2019). Corporate Governance (6th ed.). Oxford University Press.

OECD. (2003). White Paper on Corporate Governance in Latin America. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2023). G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023: Sustainability and Resilience. OECD Publishing.

Pillai, K. R., & Al-Malkawi, H. A. N. (2018). On the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from GCC countries. Research in International Business and Finance, 44, 394–410.

Ahmad, N. R. (2025). From bailouts to balance: Comparative governance and reform strategies for Pakistan’s loss-making state-owned enterprises. Policy Research Journal, 3(11), 600–614. https://policyrj.com/1/article/view/1308

Downloads

Published

2026-10-23